Skip to main content

Advertisement

Distant metastases in phyllodes tumours of the breast: an overview

Article metrics

Abstract

Phyllodes tumours (PTs) of the breast are uncommon fibroepithelial neoplasms, comprising 0.3 – 1.0% of all primary breast malignancies in Western countries, but accounting for a higher proportion of primary breast tumours in Asian countries. They are graded as benign, borderline or malignant based on the World Health Organisation (WHO) classification, according to a constellation of 5 histologic parameters. While most PTs carry a good prognosis, malignant and occasionally borderline PTs have the potential to metastasize to distant sites. Although events of distant metastasis are few, the prognosis for such patients is dismal, as they are often unresponsive to chemotherapy with high mortality. This review seeks to provide an overview of this rare but important phenomenon of distant metastases in PTs of the breast.

Background

Phyllodes tumours (PTs) of the breast are uncommon fibroepithelial neoplasms morphologically characterised by benign double-layered epithelium surrounded by a hypercellular stroma, which together exhibit a leaf-like architecture [1]. They are classified into benign, borderline, and malignant according to the World Health Organisation (WHO) classification, based on the assessment of 5 histologic parameters – stromal cellularity, stromal atypia, mitoses, stromal overgrowth, and tumour margins. PTs comprise 0.3 – 1.0% of all primary breast tumours in Western countries. In Asian countries however, PTs account for a higher proportion of primary breast tumours and can also develop in younger patients [1].

The majority (60.0%–75.0%) of PTs are benign. Benign PTs carry a good prognosis, and are generally well managed with surgery, with a local recurrence rate of about 10.0%–20.0% [2,3,4]. Borderline and malignant PTs account for 15.0 – 20.0% and 10.0 – 20.0% of all PTs respectively [1]. Unlike benign PTs, malignant PTs, and occasionally borderline PTs, can behave in a clinically aggressive manner, with local recurrence rates of malignant PTs ranging from 15.0 to 40.0%. Distant metastasis is rare, occurring nearly exclusively in malignant PTs at a rate of 9.0 – 27.0%. Although a rare event, the prognosis of patients with metastasis is very poor, as many are unresponsive to standard chemotherapy with ensuing mortality [4].

As events of distant metastases in PTs are rare, there are limited studies on this clinically important phenomenon. This review seeks to provide a literature overview of PTs with distant metastases.

Rates of metastasis in PTs

A summary of studies containing PTs with distant metastases by various authors can be found in Table 1. The overall rates of distant metastases in PTs range from 1.7 to 27.1% [5, 6], with an average of 5.6%, and vary according to tumour grade. It is highly unlikely for benign PTs to metastasize to distant sites; however, rare exceptions do exist. Reinfuss et al. [7] documented 3 cases of benign PTs that developed metastases, while Mangi et al. [8], Chaney et al. [9], Asoglu et al. [10], and Abdalla et al. [11] each recorded 1 case of metastatic benign PT in their studies. In the study by Mangi and colleagues, the case of benign PT that later metastasized was initially treated with a simple excision. The lesion was 2 cm in size and the surgical margins were <1 mm. Distant metastasis (site not mentioned) developed 36 months later and the patient underwent a total mastectomy and radiotherapy, but eventually still succumbed to the disease. It is also noteworthy that the PT cases by Mangi et al. and Asoglu et al. were categorised as low grade, instead of benign. The average rate of metastasis amongst benign PT is 0.4%, based on literature reports (Table 1). It is acknowledged however, that accurate grading relies on diligent sampling of these usually large tumours, and it is possible that benign PTs that metastasized may have been under-graded.

Table 1 A summary of studies with metastatic PT

There is potential for borderline PTs to metastasize, although the risk is very low. The rate of metastasis amongst borderline PTs averages around 2.9% (Table 1), as documented in 8 studies [5,11,12,13,14,, 7, 1015].

Although the occurrence of distant metastasis in benign PTs is a rare and aberrant phenomenon, metastases in malignant PTs have been recorded in quite a number of studies (All studies in Table 1). Even though events are still considered uncommon, the average metastatic rate of malignant PT is around 20.0% (Table 1).

Sites of metastasis

Metastasis occurs mostly through the haematogenous route [16]. The most common site of distant metastasis for PT appears to be the lungs. Of the 21 studies which mentioned sites of metastasis, 20 documented patients whose PTs had spread were to the lungs. The second most common site for PT metastasis is the bone, with 12 studies containing patients with bone metastases. A picture of a malignant PT and its lung metastasis is shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure1

a Primary malignant phyllodes tumour shows a fibroadenomatoid area juxtaposed to more cellular zones with pleomorphic cells. b Higher magnification of the phyllodes tumour displaying malignant stromal cells with stromal overgrowth. c Metastatic phyllodes tumour to the lung, composed only of malignant stromal cells

Although the lungs and skeleton are the usual sites of distant metastasis for PT, almost all other organs have been shown to be afflicted, including the adrenal glands [17], brain [7,10,, 911, 17, 18], gastrointestinal tract [17,20,, 1921], heart [22], kidney [23], liver [2, 10, 15, 16, 24, 25], mesentery [26], pancreas and pleura [15], retroperitoneum [16], soft tissues [2, 5, 15, 26, 27], spleen and thyroid [19], tonsil [28], uterus [19], and vulva [29].

Lymph node metastases are less frequent, although 10.0 – 15.0% of patients may present with clinical lymphadenopathy, they are usually as a result of reactive hyperplasia due to tumour necrosis or infection [11, 30]. In a study conducted by Gullett and colleagues [31], 9.0% of 1035 cases of patients with PT were subjected to an axillary sampling of ≥ 10 lymph nodes but nodal involvement was documented only in 9 patients. Of the 17 studies with information on lymph node metastasis in Table 1, 10 of them recorded no lymph node metastasis. With the exception of Sawalhi and Shatti [20], the remaining 6 studies displayed a lymph node metastatic rate of less than 5.0%. It is therefore not recommended to perform routine axillary dissection [32].

Histologically, the majority of the metastases contain only the stromal elements, without the epithelium [1, 32]. However, two unusual cases of metastatic PTs incorporating epithelial components have been documented by West et al. [33], and Kracht et al. [34]. The former described a case of PT metastasizing to the lungs with the pulmonary lesion containing the stroma, a well-differentiated myxoid fibrosarcoma, and the epithelium, which was mono-layered and appeared to be benign. The second case, recorded by Kracht and colleagues, detailed a malignant PT with liposarcomatous differentiation that metastasized to the lungs. The lung metastasis was a replication of the primary PT, displaying both the benign epithelium (bilayered ductal structures comprising luminal and basal cells) and malignant liposarcomatous stroma.

Prognosis of patients with metastasis in PT

The majority of PTs carry a good prognosis; however, patients who develop distant metastasis tend to have a very dismal clinical outlook, oftentimes leading to death. The time that it takes for distant metastasis to develop can be very varied, from as short as 2 months post-treatment [7, 26], to longer than a decade [17] (Table 1).

As patients with metastatic PTs may not respond well to standard chemotherapy, death often ensues [4]. As many as 15 studies summarized in Table 1 describe a 100.0% mortality rate amongst patients with metastatic PTs. The remaining studies displaying metastatic PT death rates had mortality rates exceeding 50.0%. The time to death is also relatively short, ranging from 1.0 to 41.1 months from the diagnosis of distant metastasis (Table 1).

Factors associated with metastasis

In 2012, a nomogram for predicting PT recurrences was developed by Tan and colleagues [2], based on the assessment of 4 predictive factors, namely, stromal atypia, mitoses, overgrowth, and surgical margins (AMOS). This nomogram was subsequently validated in two small case series [35, 36]. Its widespread use in clinical practice is limited by the rarity of PTs in general. Nevertheless, it is being further validated in 2 larger cohorts [37, 38]. Although several studies have looked into the various factors that may predict distant metastasis of PTs, none were successfully established and universally recognised as reliable predictors of PT metastasis, in part due to the limited number of such events. One of the earlier studies by Ward and Evans [19], which examined 26 cases of cystosarcoma phyllodes (synonymous with PTs), found that stromal overgrowth was significantly associated with metastasis (p = 0.0014). Stromal overgrowth as a predictor of PT metastasis was also supported by 4 other studies [5, 9, 10, 26].

Other clinico-pathological predictive factors for distant metastasis include severe nuclear pleomorphism [26], mitotic activity [5, 26], positive surgical margins [3, 5, 6, 11, 15, 26], large tumour size [6, 26, 39], presence of necrosis [3, 26], tumour grade [9, 11, 14, 15, 20, 24, 39], stromal cellularity and atypia, heterologous stromal elements [5], and young age [3].

Studies investigating the predictive value of biomarkers for PT metastasis have also been performed. Al-Masri and colleagues [40] studied the expression of CD10 in 43 cases of PTs and found that positive CD10 expression was significantly associated with the development of distant metastasis (p < 0.05). Ren et al. [14] also noted in their study that positive expression of Axl (p = 0.006) and ST6GalNAcII (p = 0.015) correlated significantly with distant metastasis in PT. In another study by Tan et al. [41], high stromal cytoplasmic expression of Six1 was shown to be independently associated with distant metastasis and local recurrence (p = 0.044).

Recent molecular developments in PTs have revealed insights into the pathogenesis of PTs, in particular the identification of recurrent mediator complex subunit 12 (MED12) somatic mutations, found in fibroadenomas and all grades of PTs [42,43,44,45]. Mutations in FLNA (28.0%), SETD2 (21.0%) and KMT2D (9.0%) were also discovered, which are believed to contribute to tumour progression in PTs [46]. Currently, the genomic features of primary PTs and their metastases are not well understood. Molecular studies on malignant PTs are few [47], and to the best of our knowledge, no studies have focused on comparing the genomic profiles of primary PTs and their metastases.

Conclusions

The clinical behaviour of PTs can be very unpredictable, as seemingly benign PTs can recur as malignant PTs and develop distant metastasis, while cases with malignant histology may never exhibit metastatic behaviour at all. However, it is clear that malignant PTs stand the highest risk of developing distant metastases, compared to borderline and benign PTs. The most common sites of distant metastasis are the lungs and skeleton; however nearly all other organs have been shown to be affected as well. Patient prognosis is extremely poor after metastatic spread, with death oftentimes ensuing. Several factors, such as stromal overgrowth, have been shown to be significantly associated with the occurrence of distant metastasis, although there are still no established robust pathological characteristics to predict which cases of PTs are at risk of developing distant metastasis. Future work investigating the predictive factors of distant metastases in PTs will be another step closer in identifying patients who are at higher risk of developing distant metastasis, in order to optimize their management.

Abbreviations

DM:

Distant metastasis

PT:

Phyllodes tumour

WHO:

World Health Organisation

References

  1. 1.

    Lakhani S, Ellis I, Schnitt S, Tan P, van de Vijver M, editors. WHO Classification of Tumours of the Breast. 4th ed. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2012.

  2. 2.

    Tan P, Thike A, Tan W, Thu M, Busmanis I, Li H, et al. Predicting clinical behaviour of breast phyllodes tumours: a nomogram based on histological criteria and surgical margins. J Clin Pathol. 2012;65(1):69–76.

  3. 3.

    Spitaleri G, Toesca A, Botteri E, Bottiglieri L, Rotmensz N, Boselli S, et al. Breast phyllodes tumor: a review of literature and a single center retrospective series analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2013;88(2):427–36.

  4. 4.

    Zhang Y, Kleer C. Phyllodes Tumor of the Breast: Histopathologic Features, Differential Diagnosis, and Molecular/Genetic Updates. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2016;140(7):665–71.

  5. 5.

    Chen W, Cheng S, Tzen C, Yang T, Jeng K, Liu C, et al. Surgical treatment of phyllodes tumors of the breast: retrospective review of 172 cases. J Surg Oncol. 2005;91(3):185–94.

  6. 6.

    Kapiris I, Nasiri N, A'Hern R, Healy V, Gui G. Outcome and predictive factors of local recurrence and distant metastases following primary surgical treatment of high-grade malignant phyllodes tumours of the breast. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2001;27(8):723–30.

  7. 7.

    Reinfuss M, Mituś J, Duda K, Stelmach A, Ryś J, Smolak K. The treatment and prognosis of patients with phyllodes tumor of the breast: an analysis of 170 cases. Cancer. 1996;77(5):910–6.

  8. 8.

    Mangi A, Smith B, Gadd M, Tanabe K, Ott M, Souba W. Surgical management of phyllodes tumors. Arch Surg. 1999;134(5):487–92.

  9. 9.

    Chaney A, Pollack A, McNeese M, Zagars G, Pisters P, Pollock R, et al. Primary treatment of cystosarcoma phyllodes of the breast. Cancer. 2000;89(7):1502–11.

  10. 10.

    Asoglu O, Ugurlu M, Blanchard K, Grant C, Reynolds C, Cha S, et al. Risk factors for recurrence and death after primary surgical treatment of malignant phyllodes tumors. Ann Surg Oncol. 2004;11(11):1011–7.

  11. 11.

    Abdalla H, Sakr M. Predictive factors of local recurrence and survival following primary surgical treatment of phyllodes tumors of the breast. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst. 2006;18(2):125–33.

  12. 12.

    Cheng S, Chang Y, Liu T, Lee J, Tzen C, Liu C. Phyllodes tumor of the breast: the challenge persists. World J Surg. 2006;30(8):1414–21.

  13. 13.

    Belkacémi Y, Bousquet G, Marsiglia H, Ray-Coquard I, Magné N, Malard Y, et al. Phyllodes tumor of the breast. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;70(2):492–500.

  14. 14.

    Ren D, Li Y, Gong Y, Xu J, Miao X, Li X, et al. Phyllodes tumor of the breast: role of Axl and ST6GalNAcII in the development of mammary phyllodes tumors. Tumour Biol. 2014;35(10):9603–12.

  15. 15.

    Wei J, Tan Y, Cai Y, Yuan Z, Yang D, Wang S, et al. Predictive factors for the local recurrence and distant metastasis of phyllodes tumors of the breast: a retrospective analysis of 192 cases at a single center. Chin J Cancer. 2014;33(10):492–500.

  16. 16.

    Lindquist K, Van H, Weiland L, Martin J. Recurrent and metastatic cystosarcoma phyllodes. Am J Surg. 1982;144(3):341–3.

  17. 17.

    Ramakant P, Selvamani, Therese M, Paul M. Metastatic malignant phyllodes tumor of the breast: an aggressive disease-analysis of 7 cases. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2015;6(6):363–9.

  18. 18.

    Rowe J, Prayson R. Metastatic malignant phyllodes tumor involving the cerebellum. J Clin Neurosci. 2015;22(1):226–7.

  19. 19.

    Ward R, Evans H. Cystosarcoma phyllodes. A clinicopathologic study of 26 cases. Cancer. 1986;58(10):2282–9.

  20. 20.

    Sawalhi S, Al-Shatti M. Phyllodes tumor of the breast: a retrospective study of the impact of histopathological factors in local recurrence and distant metastasis. Ann Saudi Med. 2013;33(2):162–8.

  21. 21.

    Choi D, Chi H, Lee S, Kwon Y, Park S, Sim S, et al. A Rare Case of Phyllodes Tumor Metastasis to the Stomach Presenting as Anemia. Cancer Res Treat. 2016;doi: 10.4143/crt.2016.188.

  22. 22.

    Mačák J, Hurník P, Dvořáčková J, Mačáková J. An isolated metastasis to the heart from a malignant phyllodes tumor with osteosarcomatous differentiation. Cesk Patol. 2014;50(4):146–9.

  23. 23.

    Karczmarek-Borowska B, Bukala A, Syrek-Kaplita K, Ksiazek M, Filipowska J, Gradalska-Lampart M. A rare case of breast malignant phyllodes tumor with metastases to the kidney: case report. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94(33):10.

  24. 24.

    Lenhard M, Kahlert S, Himsl I, Ditsch N, Untch M, Bauerfeind I. Phyllodes tumour of the breast: clinical follow-up of 33 cases of this rare disease. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008;138(2):217–21.

  25. 25.

    Hassan S, Ud D, Kayani N. Malignant phyllodes tumor in an 11-year-old girl with fatal clinical outcome. A case report. Breast Dis. 2016;36(1):61–4.

  26. 26.

    Hawkins R, Schofield J, Fisher C, Wiltshaw E, McKinna J. The clinical and histologic criteria that predict metastases from cystosarcoma phyllodes. Cancer. 1992;69(1):141–7.

  27. 27.

    Sotheran W, Domjan J, Jeffrey M, Wise M, Perry P. Phyllodes tumours of the breast--a retrospective study from 1982-2000 of 50 cases in Portsmouth. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2005;87(5):339–44.

  28. 28.

    Sano R, Sato E, Watanabe T, Oshima H, Ando A, Masaki M, et al. Phyllodes tumor metastasis to the tonsil with synchronous undifferentiated carcinoma. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2014;5(6):290–3.

  29. 29.

    Ajenifuja O, Kolomeyevskaya N, Habib F, Odunsi A, Lele S. Phyllodes tumor of the breast metastasizing to the vulva. Case Rep Oncol Med. 2015;2015:589547.

  30. 30.

    Rowell M, Perry R, Hsiu J, Barranco S. Phyllodes tumors. Am J Surg. 1993;165(3):376–9.

  31. 31.

    Gullett N, Rizzo M, Johnstone P. National surgical patterns of care for primary surgery and axillary staging of phyllodes tumors. Breast J. 2009;15(1):41–4.

  32. 32.

    Tan B, Acs G, Apple S, Badve S, Bleiweiss I, Brogi E, et al. Phyllodes tumours of the breast: a consensus review. Histopathology. 2016;68(1):5–21.

  33. 33.

    West T, Weiland L, Clagett O. Cystosarcoma phyllodes. Ann Surg. 1971;173(4):520–8.

  34. 34.

    Kracht J, Sapino A, Bussolati G. Malignant phyllodes tumor of breast with lung metastases mimicking the primary. Am J Surg Pathol. 1998;22(10):1284–90.

  35. 35.

    Nishimura R, Tan P, Thike A, Tan M, Taira N, Li H, et al. Utility of the Singapore nomogram for predicting recurrence-free survival in Japanese women with breast phyllodes tumours. J Clin Pathol. 2014;67(8):748–50.

  36. 36.

    Chng T, Lee J, Lee C, Li H, Tan M, Tan P. Validation of the Singapore nomogram for outcome prediction in breast phyllodes tumours: an Australian cohort. J Clin Pathol. 2016;69(12):1124–6.

  37. 37.

    Cristando C, Li H, Almekinders M, Tan PH, Brogi E, Murray M. Validation of the Singapore Nomogram for Outcome Prediction in a US-Based Population of Women with Breast Phyllodes Tumors (PT). 2017. United States & Canadian Academy of Pathology 106th Annual Meeting. http://www.nature.com/modpathol/journal/v30/n2s/pdf/modpathol2016241a.pdf. Accessed 09 Feb 2017.

  38. 38.

    Chng TW, Gudi M, Li HH, Tan PH. Validation of the Singapore Nomogram for Outcome Prediction in Breast Phyllodes Tumors in a Large Patient Cohort. 2017. United States & Canadian Academy of Pathology 106th Annual Meeting. http://www.nature.com/modpathol/journal/v30/n2s/pdf/modpathol2016241a.pdf. Accessed 09 Feb 2017.

  39. 39.

    de Roos W, Kaye P, Dent D. Factors leading to local recurrence or death after surgical resection of phyllodes tumours of the breast. Br J Surg. 1999;86(3):396–9.

  40. 40.

    Al-Masri M, Darwazeh G, Sawalhi S, Mughrabi A, Sughayer M, Al-Shatti M. Phyllodes tumor of the breast: role of CD10 in predicting metastasis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(4):1181–4.

  41. 41.

    Tan W, Thike A, Bay B, Tan P. Immunohistochemical expression of homeoproteins Six1 and Pax3 in breast phyllodes tumours correlates with histological grade and clinical outcome. Histopathology. 2014;64(6):807–17.

  42. 42.

    Lim W, Ong C, Tan J, Thike A, Ng C, Rajasegaran V, et al. Exome sequencing identifies highly recurrent MED12 somatic mutations in breast fibroadenoma. Nat Genet. 2014;46(8):877–80.

  43. 43.

    Ng C, Tan J, Ong C, Lim W, Rajasegaran V, Nasir N, et al. MED12 is frequently mutated in breast phyllodes tumours: a study of 112 cases. J Clin Pathol. 2015;68(9):685–91.

  44. 44.

    Yoshida M, Sekine S, Ogawa R, Yoshida H, Maeshima A, Kanai Y, et al. Frequent MED12 mutations in phyllodes tumours of the breast. Br J Cancer. 2015;112(10):1703–8.

  45. 45.

    Cani A, Hovelson D, McDaniel A, Sadis S, Haller M, Yadati V, et al. Next-Gen Sequencing Exposes Frequent MED12 Mutations and Actionable Therapeutic Targets in Phyllodes Tumors. Mol Cancer Res. 2015;13(4):613–9.

  46. 46.

    Tan J, Ong C, Lim W, Ng C, Thike A, Ng L, et al. Genomic landscapes of breast fibroepithelial tumors. Nat Genet. 2015;47(11):1341–5.

  47. 47.

    Gatalica Z, Vranic S, Ghazalpour A, Xiu J, Ocal I, McGill J, et al. Multiplatform molecular profiling identifies potentially targetable biomarkers in malignant phyllodes tumors of the breast. Oncotarget. 2016;7(2):1707–16.

  48. 48.

    Tan E, Tan P, Yong W, Wong H, Ho G, Yeo A, et al. Recurrent phyllodes tumours of the breast: pathological features and clinical implications. ANZ J Surg. 2006;76(6):476–80.

  49. 49.

    Guillot E, Couturaud B, Reyal F, Curnier A, Ravinet J, Laé M, et al. Management of phyllodes breast tumors. Breast J. 2011;17(2):129–37.

  50. 50.

    Jang J, Choi M, Lee S, Kim S, Kim J, Lee J, et al. Clinicopathologic risk factors for the local recurrence of phyllodes tumors of the breast. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(8):2612–7.

  51. 51.

    Do S, Kim J, Kang S, Lee J, Lee J, Nam S, et al. Expression of TWIST1, Snail, Slug, and NF-κB and methylation of the TWIST1 promoter in mammary phyllodes tumor. Tumour Biol. 2013;34(1):445–53.

  52. 52.

    Bumpers H, Tadros T, Gabram-Mendola S, Rizzo M, Martin M, Zaremba N, et al. Phyllodes tumors in African American women. Am J Surg. 2015;210(1):74–9.

  53. 53.

    Demian G, Fayaz S, El-Sayed E, Nazmy N, Samir S, George T, et al. Phyllodes tumors of the breast: analysis of 35 cases from a single institution. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst. 2016;28(4):243–8.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

VK drafted the manuscript. AAT contributed to the content of the manuscript and also revised it. PHT revised it critically for important intellectual context and gave final approval of the version to be published.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Author information

Correspondence to Puay Hoon Tan.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koh, V.C.Y., Thike, A.A. & Tan, P.H. Distant metastases in phyllodes tumours of the breast: an overview. Appl Cancer Res 37, 15 (2017) doi:10.1186/s41241-017-0028-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Fibroepithelial neoplasms
  • Phyllodes tumours
  • Metastasis
  • Distant metastases
  • Prognosis